This guide is for students in the ANTH 215 course. It has general research tips and sources for topics such as archaeology, Atlantis, Cardiff Giant, mound builders, etc. There is a separate LibGuide on Bigfoot at http://wiu.libguides.com/c.php?g=363805. This guide helps point to books at WIU, good websites, and electronic resources that can be accessed to study these topics.
Pseudoarcheology, also known as alternative or fringe archeology, is a field of study that involves theories and claims about the past that are not supported by mainstream scientific evidence. Pseudoarcheologists typically promote untested or unproven theories and ideas, often relying on biased interpretations, hoaxes, and sensationalism. Conducting research on pseudoarcheology can be challenging for several reasons, including the lack of reliable data, the inherent bias of the subject matter, and the persistence of popular misconceptions.
One of the primary challenges in researching pseudoarcheology is the lack of reliable data. Pseudoarcheologists often present their theories without providing concrete evidence to support them. They may make grandiose claims about ancient civilizations or artifacts without providing any data to back up their assertions. This can make it difficult for researchers to verify the claims being made and evaluate the validity of the evidence. In contrast, mainstream archaeology relies on rigorous methods to gather and analyze data to support their theories, ensuring that their findings are based on empirical evidence.
Another challenge in researching pseudoarcheology is the inherent bias of the subject matter. Pseudoarcheologists often approach their research with preconceived notions and ideological commitments that can influence their findings. For example, some pseudoarcheologists may subscribe to a particular worldview or religious belief that colors their interpretations of archeological evidence. As a result, they may selectively choose evidence that supports their beliefs, ignoring or dismissing data that contradicts their claims. This can make it difficult for researchers to approach the subject matter with an open mind and evaluate the evidence objectively.
A third challenge in researching pseudoarcheology is the persistence of popular misconceptions. Pseudoarcheological claims can be highly sensational and appeal to people's imaginations and desires to discover hidden or lost knowledge about the past. These claims often perpetuate popular misconceptions about the ancient world, such as the idea that aliens or supernatural beings built ancient structures or that advanced technology existed in the past. These misconceptions can be difficult to overcome because they are often deeply ingrained in popular culture and can be challenging to dispel.
In conclusion, researching pseudoarcheology can be challenging due to the lack of reliable data, the inherent bias of the subject matter, and the persistence of popular misconceptions. These challenges make it difficult for researchers to approach the subject matter with an open mind and evaluate the evidence objectively. Nevertheless, it is essential to engage with the claims and theories of pseudoarcheologists to evaluate their validity critically. By doing so, researchers can contribute to a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the past, free from the biases and sensationalism that often accompany pseudoarcheological claims.
