Skip to Main Content

ANTH 215 (Fantastic Archaeology: Ancient Astronauts, Shape Shifters and Bigfoot!): Atlantis

This guide is for students in the ANTH 215 course. It has general research tips and sources for topics such as archaeology, Atlantis, Cardiff Giant, mound builders, etc.

Description

Information on Atlantis for the ANTH 215 course.

Links

Pseudoarcheology and the Atlantis Myth: Unraveling the Truths and Fictions

Pseudoarcheology, also known as alternative archeology or fringe archeology, refers to interpretations of the past that deviate from the established academic and scientific norms. Often, these interpretations rely on sensational claims and unsound methodologies, leading to a distortion of the past and the creation of myths. One of the most famous subjects of pseudoarcheology is the lost city of Atlantis, which has captured the imagination of countless people over the centuries. This essay aims to explore the origins of the Atlantis myth and its associations with pseudoarcheology while addressing the reasons behind its enduring popularity.

The Origins of the Atlantis Myth

The story of Atlantis can be traced back to ancient Greece, specifically to the works of the philosopher Plato. In his dialogues "Timaeus" and "Critias," Plato tells the story of a powerful and advanced civilization that existed about 9,000 years before his time. According to the legend, the city of Atlantis was situated on an island in the Atlantic Ocean and was destroyed in a single day and night of catastrophic earthquakes and floods.

The association of the Atlantis myth with pseudoarcheology can be attributed to the vague and fantastical nature of Plato's account. Though many scholars believe that Plato's Atlantis was a fictional allegory, others have taken the story literally and have attempted to identify the lost city's location, often relying on speculative theories and questionable evidence.

Pseudoarcheological Claims and Methods

Pseudoarcheologists often build their theories around Atlantis by cherry-picking and misinterpreting archeological and geological evidence. For example, some have pointed to similarities between ancient cultures in the Americas and the Mediterranean as evidence of a shared Atlantean heritage. The independent development of cultural practices and technologies in various regions, however, can also account for these similarities.

Others have suggested that Atlantis could be found in locations such as the Caribbean, the Azores, or even Antarctica. These claims often rely on misreadings of ancient texts or misinterpretations of geological and archeological data. The absence of rigorous peer review and reliance on selective evidence further weaken these arguments.

The Appeal of the Atlantis Myth

The enduring popularity of the Atlantis myth can be attributed to various factors. Firstly, the story appeals to the human fascination with mystery and the unknown. The idea of a lost, advanced civilization tantalizes the imagination and invites speculation.

Secondly, the Atlantis myth can be seen as an expression of cultural nostalgia, reflecting a longing for a lost golden age. This nostalgia can be particularly appealing in times of societal uncertainty or change, as people look for reassurance in the imagined accomplishments of their ancestors.

Lastly, the Atlantis myth can serve as a cautionary tale, warning humanity of the dangers of hubris and the potential consequences of abusing power and knowledge.

Conclusion

The Atlantis myth remains an enticing enigma, captivating generations of people in search of a lost civilization. While the tale has inspired numerous pseudoarcheological theories, these claims are often based on conjecture and a selective reading of the evidence. The enduring appeal of Atlantis lies in its ability to inspire curiosity and wonder, even as it serves as a reminder of the need for rigorous, evidence-based research in the quest to understand our past. As we continue to unravel the truth behind myths like Atlantis, it is crucial to rely on scientific methodology and an open-minded approach that avoids the pitfalls of pseudoarcheology.

Books